Jennifer Lopez: Cheating, Jealousy, Control & Ben Affleck

What does Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony have in common with cheating, lies, control and Ben Affleck? JLo’s marriage to Marc Anthony crumbled after seven years and it appears that these were the main factors. According to US magazine, Marc Anthony is accused of cheating on Jennifer at least once in 2009 and was jealous of her blossoming career. Marc sought full control over Jennifer’s career, her fashion choices and her life. It was no secret that Jennifer Lopez may have stalled on accepting a new contract with American Idol because Marc wanted Jenn to stay home with the kids.

A source tells US magazine,

“It was a very bad marriage, and Jennifer got the courage to end things,” Adding, JLo “actually has low self-esteem. And Marc really played into that insecurity. That’s why she put up with his abuse for such a long time.”

And where does Ben Affleck come in? Jennifer’s mother Guadalupe reportedly emailed him to seek advise for JLo’s crumbling marriage. Not sure how much advice Ben could offer, but reportedly three days after Affleck responded to the email, Jennifer and Marc announced their split.

How much do you think, cheating, jealousy and control played into Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony’s divorce?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top